Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 08, 2010, 05:25:55 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: PMRF Review 2007: http://www.timawa.net/walkarounds/3-6-07/

+  Philippine Defense Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Equipment and Gear
| | |-+  Philippine Marine Corps M3 SpecOps Generation 2
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Author Topic: Philippine Marine Corps M3 SpecOps Generation 2  (Read 2907 times)
opus
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 5577



« on: February 27, 2005, 10:06:27 AM »

http://www.timawa.net/m3/m3gen2.htm
Logged

It's the Philippines.  We don't have serial killings, we have acts of spontaneous heinousness. - Jessica Zafra
israeli
Member
*****
Posts: 4594



« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2005, 10:09:53 AM »

hey Opus! Very Happy

hmmmmmmm... Grease Guns... how long have they been in the PMC inventory? aren't these guns from the 1950's-1960's? were these Grease Guns given upgrades prior to their re-issuance to our troops? Question
Logged

"Nobody in life gets exactly what they thought they were going to get. But if you work really hard and you're kind, amazing things will happen."

- Conan O'Brien
Manokski
Global Moderator
Member
*****
Posts: 1841


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2005, 10:19:10 AM »

Quote from: israeli
hey Opus! Very Happy

hmmmmmmm... Grease Guns... how long have they been in the PMC inventory? aren't these guns from the 1950's-1960's? were these Grease Guns given upgrades prior to their re-issuance to our troops? Question


Israeli, hindi ka ba nag-babasa?
Logged

Manokskis Orbat
http://www.HueyBravo.net
Huey Bravo

"The nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools" - Thucydides

"When you go home, tell them for us and say, For your tomorrow we gave our today" Flags of our Fathers. James Bradley
opus
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 5577



« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2005, 10:27:14 AM »

Production of M3s started and ended in World War 2.  All reserve stocks in the AFP's inventory are from that era.

The original M3 information page is here:

http://www.timawa.net/m3/m3.htm
Logged

It's the Philippines.  We don't have serial killings, we have acts of spontaneous heinousness. - Jessica Zafra
gary1910
Member
*****
Posts: 91


« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2005, 11:33:37 AM »

Wow, others are retiring 70s weapons, you guys still using those from WW2!!!!

BTW what the calibre, and who is still making them?
Logged
Manokski
Global Moderator
Member
*****
Posts: 1841


WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2005, 12:05:39 PM »

Quote from: gary1910
Wow, others are retiring 70s weapons, you guys still using those from WW2!!!!

BTW what the calibre, and who is still making them?


What's wrong with that?  The M2 .50 Cal Browning dates back from WW1 (yes One!) and it's still in use.  Barrel wise, the M3s have hardly been used so these guns are almost new.  Old design, but new.  If it does the job, why replace it?
Logged

Manokskis Orbat
http://www.HueyBravo.net
Huey Bravo

"The nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools" - Thucydides

"When you go home, tell them for us and say, For your tomorrow we gave our today" Flags of our Fathers. James Bradley
troung
Member
*****
Posts: 310



« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2005, 12:34:50 PM »

"Wow, others are retiring 70s weapons, you guys still using those from WW2!!!!"

They cost a lot less then a new build 45 caliber SMG. There are better ways to spend money then to try and look cool. Delta used M-3s in the late 1970s and early 1980s. It works, hits hard and comes very cheap, cannot beat that.  

"BTW what the calibre, and who is still making them?"

45 caliber and they are refurbs.
Logged
The Reaper
MBAC 21
Member
*****
Posts: 1018



« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2005, 12:54:55 PM »

Still looks good and effective to me. Nice additions/upgrades too.
Logged

israeli
Member
*****
Posts: 4594



« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2005, 06:09:33 PM »

Quote from: Manokski
Israeli, hindi ka ba nag-babasa?


sorry. i missed that one. i was already sleepy when i posted that question... tao lang.  Embarassed  Laughing

however, how many Grease Guns were in the PMC inventory? out that those guns, how many of them were upgraded and re-issued back into the PMC?
Logged

"Nobody in life gets exactly what they thought they were going to get. But if you work really hard and you're kind, amazing things will happen."

- Conan O'Brien
predator
Member
*****
Posts: 783


« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2005, 12:58:13 AM »

When it hit you,  you'll know the difference of it  with other submachine gun ... he he he  50 cal.
Logged
opus
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 5577



« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2005, 03:07:59 AM »

One hit from a .45 pistol will drop a charging enemy while two or three from a 9mm are needed.  It's not hard to imagine what multiple hits of .45 cal rounds in rapid succession will do.
Logged

It's the Philippines.  We don't have serial killings, we have acts of spontaneous heinousness. - Jessica Zafra
gary1910
Member
*****
Posts: 91


« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2005, 05:31:00 AM »

If it is use for Spec-ops then it is certainly not suitable, for anti-terrorist ops in building or security work still ok.

Reasons :
1) Effective range only 50m, any modern SMG with abt same length & weight is at least a 100m effective range.

For example the standard UZI has a effective range of 200m.

Those with such low effective range are only use for close combat, anti-terror or police operations.

2)Only fire in full auto mode, that it is no good for Spec-ops becos with abt ten squeeze of trigger, you need to change the 30rds mag.

Full auto mode is only useful for close quarter fighting or suppressive fire.
Thus the soldiers need more mags as well as frequent changing of mags during a contact in the field.

Modern SMG comes in several mode of fire, and in real combat , one do not uses full auto mode during battle except for close quarter fighting.

One only see full auto firing in Hollywood. Laughing
Logged
opus
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 5577



« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2005, 06:18:47 AM »

Quote from: gary1910
If it is use for Spec-ops then it is certainly not suitable, for anti-terrorist ops in building or security work still ok.

Reasons :
1) Effective range only 50m, any modern SMG with abt same length & weight is at least a 100m effective range.

For example the standard UZI has a effective range of 200m.

Those with such low effective range are only use for close combat, anti-terror or police operations.

2)Only fire in full auto mode, that it is no good for Spec-ops becos with abt ten squeeze of trigger, you need to change the 30rds mag.

Full auto mode is only useful for close quarter fighting or suppressive fire.
Thus the soldiers need more mags as well as frequent changing of mags during a contact in the field.

Modern SMG comes in several mode of fire, and in real combat , one do not uses full auto mode during battle except for close quarter fighting.

One only see full auto firing in Hollywood. Laughing


How many operations have you seen where a soldier fires an Uzi in single-shot mode?  Probably none.  Being an open-bolt weapon, the movement of the bolt spoils the accuracy of the first shot.  So if you only fire single shots, your aim is spoiled in all of them.  It is worth noting that the Grease Gun is also an open bolt weapon, but its slow rate of fire allows single shots to be squeezed, and for the aim in automatic fire to be corrected before wasting rounds.  An MP5 fires from a closed-bolt but uses 9mm rounds (two or three shots needed to be sure you've put down your target) and is EXPENSIVE.  Ask the guys in the field if they would like to have five H&K MP5s or 200 M3 Grease Guns and they'll tell you they'd rather have the Grease Guns.

The Floro Mk9 and the Government Arsenal MP9 both fire from a closed bolt but use 9mm rounds like the MP5, and at around P30,000 each are cheaper than the MP5 but are still much more expensive than the M3.

As far as the merits of the .45 round are concerned, H&K has a new pistol and a new submachine gun out:  the H&K SOCOM and the UMP, respectively.  Both are in .45 caliber.

If you want to fire your submachine gun only in single-shot mode, save government money and use your pistol instead.
Logged

It's the Philippines.  We don't have serial killings, we have acts of spontaneous heinousness. - Jessica Zafra
bustero
MBAC 21
Member
*****
Posts: 1766


« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2005, 07:27:02 AM »

Interesting developoment.  It's good to see the AFP thinking out of the box and looking at solutions instead of complaining about the problem (no money!).  While this is not optimal am all for it.
Logged
gary1910
Member
*****
Posts: 91


« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2005, 10:02:52 AM »

Quote from: opus

How many operations have you seen where a soldier fires an Uzi in single-shot mode?  Probably none.  Being an open-bolt weapon, the movement of the bolt spoils the accuracy of the first shot.  So if you only fire single shots, your aim is spoiled in all of them.  It is worth noting that the Grease Gun is also an open bolt weapon, but its slow rate of fire allows single shots to be squeezed, and for the aim in automatic fire to be corrected before wasting rounds.  An MP5 fires from a closed-bolt but uses 9mm rounds (two or three shots needed to be sure you've put down your target) and is EXPENSIVE.  Ask the guys in the field if they would like to have five H&K MP5s or 200 M3 Grease Guns and they'll tell you they'd rather have the Grease Guns.

The Floro Mk9 and the Government Arsenal MP9 both fire from a closed bolt but use 9mm rounds like the MP5, and at around P30,000 each are cheaper than the MP5 but are still much more expensive than the M3.

As far as the merits of the .45 round are concerned, H&K has a new pistol and a new submachine gun out:  the H&K SOCOM and the UMP, respectively.  Both are in .45 caliber.

If you want to fire your submachine gun only in single-shot mode, save government money and use your pistol instead.


Not very sure what u are talking abt.
I have fired M-16, SAR-80 & SAR21.
Also with LMG, LAW , M203 ,GPMG etc

The first is usually the most accurate, the subsequent rounds will be affected by the recoil of the first round.

I have fired full auto with my M-16s and see that the muzzle keep on going up, by 2~3 round it is totally out.

That is why ppl come out wif 3 round burst.

To zero a full auto LMG, only one round was loaded and fired, this is repeated 3 times , so that a good MPI is achieved thus able to accurately zero a LMG.

In a typical infantry squad/section, the full auto mode LMG will provide the suppressive fire, those using M-16s will only fire in semi auto mode.

M-16s infantry soldiers will carry abt 8~9 mag , i.e. 240~270 rounds , which is only good for 1.5 contact firing semi auto.

To fire in full auto all the time, he need to carry more mag.

LMG gunner will carry abt 500~600 rounds cos they firing in auto mode all the time.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!